Vampire Hunter
Dhampires (or Dhampir as an alternative spelling) are half vampires and half human. We are immune to the influence and machinations of vampires, yet we have their strengths and none of their weaknesses.
Dhampires are not immortal. We age and die. Dhampires also have moral sense, whereas Christian vampires renounce their moral instincts and instead follow their defunct moral standard, "The Will of 'god'".
I specialize in exposing members of the CVC, the Christian Vampire Cult, whose membership extends worldwide.
What do I do with them? :
I expose them to the light and take away their powers. (Expose them for what they are, a blood cult of ruthless immortality seekers). By doing so, I seek to break the spell they have over many would-be wanna-be vampires, (Fence-setting people who don't know if they should believe Christianity or not).
Am I serious?:
Absolutely not. This is metaphor. I'm not a Planter's cardboard nut case, nor am I a stalker in any sense of the word. I merely engage people where its appropriate, in discussion groups & message boards designated for said type of discussions. I personally consider the bible to be a book of fables, and the morality in the bible is virtually non-existent. The Christian seeker of biblical morality tries to glom onto a few passages here and there and ignore the other 1 1/2 to 2 inches thick list of horrors said to be "good". I'm not serious by saying that I'm a Dhampire, however, the point of this little monograph isn't merely bullshit. I'm making a real point, and if you read to the finish, you'll should see what it is and that it is a valid point.
Is this "hate speach"?
No, This is a colourful "tongue-in-cheek" description of other "fire and brimstone-er" people who hate everyone who is not like them.
What is the CVC?:
The Christian Vampire Cult is a blood cult filled with ruthless people who have renounced any degree of natural moral sense. They are Christians who are sooo brainwashed that they will argue that its morally good and justice that 'god' aka the four lettered word YHWH forced parents to eat their sons and daughters in Jeremiah 19 and Ezekiel 5 and forced little children to eat their parents, also in Ezekiel 5. These are people that are soooo far gone and brainwashed that they no longer have any common moral sense or instinct.
Are all Christians vampires?:
No, obviously not. Some Christians are not vampires, and some are. And some people are Christian vampire enablers, (the "Renfields") that, although they are not vampires themselves (and may not even be Christian or believe in any real Satan or real 'god'), they still argue in favor of the vampires, offer them philosophical shelter to hide in from the light of day.
Why is "The Will of 'god'" a defunct standard of morality?:
Judeo-Christians hold the will of 'god' to be their standard of moral goodness. Doing the will of 'god' is said to be "righteous" and going against the will of 'god' is said to be a "sin" and makes one a "sinner". Holding the will of 'god' to be the default moral standard means that 'god' cannot be immoral and cannot be evil (since 'moral' & 'justice' cannot equal 'evil' by definition) since every act 'god' did/does would be an act of his will, ('god' can't act against his own will). Yet Jeremiah 19 "quotes" this character called "the lord" as saying that he will literally bring "evil" (ra' in Hebrew) upon these people and force them to eat their sons and daughters. This is a logical and moral contradiction. Moral goodness and justice cannot = evil, as knowledge of good and evil tells us definitively.
(Knowledge of good and evil definitively shows us that the Judeo-Christian moral standard is defunct).
Who or what are these Christian vampires I'm talking about?:
Christian vampires are the undead (don't grow and evolve, morally dead and soulless creatures of darkness). Dhampires have the uncanny ability to "see" these "invisible" vampires where others don't see them for what they are. Which is that they are members of a blood-cult who have sold their souls.
Christian vampires don't have souls because they've sold them to their blood-god YHWH in exchange for immortality. (Their spiritual growth is in arrested development because they've adopted a defunct and stagnant moral value system).
What was Jesus?:
Jesus was and is bait.
Saying that Christianity is about the nice teachings of Jesus is like reading pages 147-149 of Mein Kampf and thinking that Hitler was a nice guy because he was a good Catholic, treated his mistress well and loved his dog. The big picture (regarding both) is much more bleak.
If Christianity is so evil, then what it all about?:
1. Slavery.
2. Vampirism.
3. Immortality. (with a "t")
4. Immorality. (without a "t")
1. Slavery:
The bible, both the Old Testement and the New, advocate the institution of slavery.
It's no secret that the old testament advocates slavery, and Abraham even sent his slave, Hagar, and son Ishmael out into the desert to die according to one of the doublets in Genesis. Exodus even gives instructions on how to correctly sell ones daughter.
Here are some verses in the Old Testament and the New Testament on slavery from the New American Bible.
http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/#exodus
Exodus 21:20-21 "When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property."
Exodus 21:7 "When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go free as male slaves do."
(Note that many bibles translate "slave" as manservant, maidservant, or simply 'servant', but this is (intentionally?) misleading since the term servant in the modern sense of the word is not someone with whom we can beat to death or prevent from leaving. What we are talking about here is slavery, as the original Hebrew word (pronounced 'ebed {eh'-bed} conveyed.'ebed is Strong's number 05650) http://tinyurl.com/3957d7 )
Leviticus 22:10-11 "Neither a lay person nor a priest's tenant or hired servant may eat of any sacred offering. But a slave whom a priest acquires by purchase or who is born in his house may eat of his food."
(Here, Leviticus is making the distinction between a servant and a slave, as a paid servant is a sakiyr {saw-keer'}, Strong's number 07916, and slave is noted above.)
http://tinyurl.com/2zhkf4
Well, what about the New Testament? Surely it doesn't advocate slavery, right?
Wrong.
Although gospel Jesus never mentions (nor condemns) the institution of slavery, Paul of Tarsus, who wrote the vast majority of the New Testement books, was all for it, it seems. (All of the following is from the New American Bible, except where noted).
Ephesians 6:5-8
"Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ, not only when being watched, as currying favor, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, willingly serving the Lord and not human beings, knowing that each will be requited from the Lord for whatever good he does, whether he is slave or free."
Yeah, but does the Greek word translated really mean "slave"?
Yup.
The Greek word used (pronounced doulos {doo'-los}, strong's number 1401), means "slave" bond(aged) servant, just as 'ebed in Hebrew does.
http://tinyurl.com/2clsb2
What about "fear and trembling", surly it doesn't really mean fear and trembling. Yes, it does. Its phobos and tromos respectively, and mirrors the Old Testament phrase used in Psalms 2:11 "Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling"; The Hebrew yir'ah {yir-aw'} means 'fear' and ra`ad {rah'-ad} means 'to tremble with fear' respectively.
Christian vampires love to suggest that "fear and trembling" means "respect", but one does not tremble with simple respect and admiration. As noted, ra'-ad means "trembling with fear" as ra' means evil.
http://tinyurl.com/2wo5lx
More examples of the NT's advocacy of slavery taken from Paul of Tarsus' epistles (which became NT bible books, of course). Again, these are from the New American Bible.
Colossians 3:22 "Slaves, obey your human masters in everything, not only when being watched, as currying favor, but in simplicity of heart, fearing the Lord."
1 Timothy 6:1"Those who are under the yoke of slavery must regard their masters as worthy of full respect, so that the name of God and our teaching may not suffer abuse."
Titus 2:9-10 "Slaves are to be under the control of their masters in all respects, giving them satisfaction, not talking back to them or stealing from them, but exhibiting complete good faith, so as to adorn the doctrine of God our savior in every way."
1 Peter 2:18-19 "Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse. For whenever anyone bears the pain of unjust suffering because of consciousness of God, that is a grace."
1a. Slavery to 'god' :
Romans 6:20 & 22
"For when you were slaves of sin, you were free from righteousness." "But now that you have been freed from sin and have become slaves of God, the benefit that you have leads to sanctification, and its end is eternal life.
Romans 6:16
Do you not know that if you present yourselves to someone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness?
1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (New World Translation)
"What! Do YOU not know that the body of YOU people is [the] temple of the holy spirit within YOU, which YOU have from God? Also, YOU do not belong to yourselves, for YOU were bought with a price. By all means, glorify God in the body of YOU people."
1b. Slavery to the will of 'god' in Eden:
Adam and Eve in Genesis 3 committed what the early church called "Ancestral sin" and what (church fathers) St. Augustine (& Tertullian) originally termed "Original Sin". But what was this "sin" exactly? Adam & Eve were created to serve the will of 'god' perfectly and therefore were without sin. The serpent in Genesis 3 (there were no devils in Genesis 3) clued Eve in on the fact that she had options, freedom of choice. (This is what the Christian vampires percieve as "evil" from the serpent). I won't go into it here, but long story short, the serpent didn't tell any lies. It told an illicit truth. Everything the serpent said was true and what 'god' said was a lie. The typical Christian rhetoric about "death entered in" is a poppycock lie (it doesn't fit all the literary facts) because what promised to dissuade Adam & Eve from disobeying 'god' was fear of physically dying. If they weren't afraid of physically dying then what was it that was to dissuade them from "sinning"? Pauline Christians require Adam & Eve to know it was not morally good to disobey 'god' before they had any knowledge of good and evil, so the whole Papious clap-trap falls on its face since moral choice requires knowledge of good and evil, and one cannot know that its not good to do something before they know what good and evil are. Adam and Eve had to be perfect slaves to the will of 'god' and thus remain sinnless. Once Eve acted on her own freewill and liberty, she had 'fallen from grace'. Not being willing slaves to the will of 'god' is sin and was the original sin. The spin-meisters, who don't want to use the 's'-word (slavery), don't want you to know this. Adam and Eve's "eyes were opened" (Gen 3:7) to the truth after partaking of the fruit, but which one, good or evil, loses by you knowing the truth? Is it good or evil that has something to hide? Morality requires moral choice and moral choice requires knowledge of good and evil. It was only by gaining knowlege of good and evil that A&E were able to be moral people and capable of making moral choices, yet the Christian vampires will tell you than original sin was an immoral action. How can gaining the capacity to be moral be immoral and remaining a clueless ignorant slave "good"?
1c. Slavery to the will of 'god' in Heaven :
The same is true in heaven, as its described in the bible and in popular Christian dogma. Everyone in heaven must kowtow to the will of 'god', and any dissent will cause the dissenter to be cast out of heaven, to be burned or otherwise destroyed in the lowest level of Hades at the end of the world (end of the earth). Heaven is a southern slave plantation in the sky, and everyone must cater to Master's will and wishes or risk being burned and destroyed. Remember, even slaves in the American south had the choice of disobeying and thus causing themselves to be tortured or destroyed as a consequence, as in the heaven scenario, but to think that this does not mean that southern slaves were slaves would be daft. The same is true for the alleged inhabitants of heaven, because the alternative to being slaves to the will of 'god' is death and destruction, working within the myth of Judeo-Christianity of course.
2. Vampirism
John 6:53-57
"Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me."
...
John 6:61 & 66
"When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?"
...
"From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him."
Ephesians 5:2
"And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour."
Leviticus 17:11
"For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul."
Hebrews 9:22
"According to the law almost everything is purified by blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness."
Ezekiel 39:18-19
Ye shall eat the flesh of the mighty, and drink the blood of the princes of the earth.
Ye shall eat fat till ye be full, and drink blood till ye be drunken, of my sacrifice which I have sacrificed for you.
Proverbs 30:14
"There is a generation, whose teeth are as swords, and their jaw teeth as knives, to devour the poor from off the earth, and
the needy from among men."
YHWH, the blood-'god', demands blood as tribute and found the blood of Jesus to be "a sweetsmelling savour" (Ephesians 5:2). Christians must use the shed blood of innocent Jesus to gain everlasting life, i.e. immortality. That the blood-'god' YHWH will accept the blood of the innocent (Jesus) in lieu of the blood of the guilty shows that there is no semblance of Justice involved in this scenario, only a blood-'god' getting his fill by using threats on the fearful. The "blood on the cross" that the Christian vampires are so reverent of is actually the blood of an innocent person who was unjustly tortured and given the death penalty for crimes he didn't commit and this blood is described as being on the cross, i.e. the torture device used to kill him. That's not "beautiful", that's horrific.
"Doth Job fear 'god' for nought?" ~ Satan
3. Immortality
As noted above, Christians must use the shed blood of innocent Jesus to gain everlasting life, which they can't have until they are "washed in the blood" in a Jesus blood-bath. (The vampires, of course, consider the blood-bath a good thing and not evil). Christian vampires seek the "after-life", an after-death life, aka the "everlasting life" that is supposed to be granted to them as a favor after they physically die. This "life after death" is synonymous with "the living dead". The "everlasting life" of the Christian vampire is a form of immortality they seek in exchange for surrendering their "souls" to Jesus. But, of course, Jesus doesn't want their souls, YHWH does. But Christian vampires are adept at confusing the Christian bait known as the 'lamb' Jesus with the 'axe' 'god' the father, YHWH. Jesus is said to have been slain, and rose again in three days and spent time with his gaggle of 12 would be vampires and passed on his magical ability to instantly heal physical afflictions and to raise the dead.
John 6:54
"Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life..." ~ Jesus Christ, Super Vampire
John 6:57
"As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me." ~ Jesus Christ
(In other words, Jesus got his vampire powers from the blood-'god' YHWH, and so those that eat his flesh and drink his blood will become immortal vampires themselves).
4. Immorality
Jesus in the Gethsemane gardens said, "Abba, Father, all things are possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt", (Mark 14:36 KJV).
Jesus BEGGED for hours for 'god' to take this cup, his fate, from him. In Luke, its said that the character Jesus begged until he sweated blood. Jesus was not arguing or pleading that he won't do what 'god' the father wanted him to do, but rather he was begging for 'god' to change his ('god's) will. He asked him to change his 'mind'. Mark 14:34 "And saith unto them (his look-outs), "My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch". He begged and pleaded while his look-outs repeatedly went to sleep.
Long story short, 'god' the father did not change his mind. Apparently, he callously ignored Jesus' begging and pleading for his own life.
You know the story after this. "The Passion" of the Christ where Jesus is repeatedly taunted, beaten and tortured, crucified, stabbed and finally he died on the crucifixion cross.
Christian vampries often have several dogma lies or genuine misunderstandings regarding the above scenario.
1. That it was Jesus' plan to come to earth and die on the cross all along, not 'god' the father's plan.
This is not true according to the Gethsemane scenes (which we just reviewed) and according to Acts 4.
Acts 4:24-28
"And when they heard that, they lifted up their voice to God with one accord, and said, Lord, thou art God, which hast made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all that in them is: Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things? The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ. For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done."
"...both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done", in other words, it was 'god' the father's will that Herod, Pilate and "the rulers...gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ".
It was 'god' the father's master plan, not Jesus' plan. It was 'god' the father's "hand" and "counsel" that "determined before to be done". It was 'god' the father's will that Jesus be tortured to death, the same will that Jesus begged for 'god' the father to change, but didn't; "nevertheless not what I will, but what thou wilt" ~ Jesus.
2. Jesus came back to life, so 'no harm-no foul'.
Indeed, it is ironic to hear a Christian minimize and marginalize the importance of "The Passion". To hear many Christians, the events of The Passion are almost a cursory superfluous event that leads up the the "really" important event, the Resurrection. They claim to "love" Jesus, yet some Christians seem to not really care very much that he was reportedly tortured until death. Its just simply not that important to them and he could have taken sleeping pills for all they care, because in THEIR mind, Christ came to resurrect from the dead & "defeat death", regardless of how he got there.
Yet, let's ask ourselves, what does it matter whether Jesus is in heaven as a material body or as a spirit? It doesn't matter at all. If planning the torture and death of Jesus where he ended up in heaven is a "no harm-no foul" scenario, then the same can be said of your Christian aunt. Would it be "OK" to torture her to death? Indeed, this was the (ostensible) rationale behind The Crusades and their tortures. The official party line was that they were "saving souls" by torturing people to death. This was an extension of St. Augustine's rationale, although, to be fair, he never explicitly suggested that people be tortured by members of the church. If it doesn't matter whether Jesus is in heaven as a material body or as a spirit, then why did he come back and inhabit his material body? It was to show that the "ransom" (as Matthew repeatedly put it) was paid. Did the Greek word used really mean "ransom" or is this a poor translation of the word? It really means ransom.
The Greek "lutron" {loo'-tron}, Strong's number 3083 http://tinyurl.com/2fpnjo
It's "the price for redeeming, ransom. A price paid for slaves or captives. The price paid for the ransom of life."
And as I would venture, its the price paid to a terrorist.
Why the immorality of Christianity is fundementally evil.
Here's the deal in a nutshell and why I consider Christianity to be fundamentally evil.
Adam and Eve were supposed to have fallen from grace by choosing to not be slaves to the will of 'god'.
You are supposed to be "damned" because you "inherit" either this "sin" or this propensity, (depends on who you ask).
Being damned means that you WILL be punished in some horrible way (again, the way depends on who you ask).
It is said to be impossible for you to "redeem" yourself (to pay your own ransom) to 'god' the father, so you'll go to hell, Hades, lake of fire, be cast into the pit/abyss, suffer spiritual death, or otherwise not be in the presence of 'god'. Somehow, some way, you will be given some unbearable punishment that is totally unavoidable by your thoughts or actions alone. Some even consider that you inherit this primordial "sin upon conception". You're damned as soon as the sperm enters the egg. (How's that for injustice?)
But there's a loop hole, (of course), you can condone 'god' the father arranging Jesus' torture and death, say that it is "mercy" and "grace", jump through a couple of other hoops, like being baptized, and "repent", and you can get into "paradise" where people sit around all day blowing smoke up 'god's ass about how wonderful he is for not being able to forgive anyone for being born without them thanking him for planning his innocent son's torture and death.
Jesus, however, is more or less portrayed as a great guy in the bible (if we overlook a few callous moments). He was shoved into a catch-22. Either he had to agree to be tortured and die, or everyone on the planet would be sent to hell, or endure some other punishing tortures. This is the condition, his "cup" of fate, that Jesus was begging to be let out of. It was an unfair and unjust scenario to place on Jesus' shoulders. You should blame 'god' for this. Yes, this biblical character 'god' who is no doubt pure boogie-man fiction.
This is the whole deal with Christianity, that its ostensibly "just" for the innocent (Jesus) to pay the death penalty for crimes he didn't commit. And its supposed to be morally good for "the guilty" (sinners) to get off scott-free if they condone the torture and slaughter of this innocent person.
It's supposed to be "justice" to allow an innocent man to die paying a penalty with his life instead of the "guilty" paying for their "crimes" (sins), and then letting the guilty run free if they condone this innocent person's unjust torture and death.
If would be Christians condone Jesus' torture and death, then they stand to (a) avoid being tortured themselves, and (b) be rewarded by being sent to "paradise" for their coerced immoral action of accepting the conditions an innocent person paying for their "crimes" with his life.
Of course, this is immoral and unjust, and the Christian is condoning this immorality under the threat of torture, its a forced, coerced immoral action that is provoked by the ostensible 'god' the father, the terrorist you are supposed to "fear".
This is extraordinarily immoral, and I venture to say, evil. How can an idea about what I consider fantasy be "evil"?
It's evil because it is an idea which calls for an evil action on the part of the "believer". Condoning evil for personal profit is itself an evil action.
Christian vampires are fine with innocent Jesus being tortured and killed simply because they profit from it and thereby gain immortality and avoid being tortured themselves. Their implicit motto is "better Jesus than me", when THEY say that 'god' the father threatening to torture people for sin is "justice". So, they are content to avoid "justice" and condone the innocent being tortured to death because they profit from this. They say they "love" Jesus, but they don't love Jesus, they love condoning his torture and death for their own personal profit.
Some Christians want Jesus.
Christian vampires don't want Jesus; they simply want Jesus dead.
Christian vampires are evil.
The Dhampire
LOGOS
Skeleton
key